Give Me a Fair Pay-For-Performance Plan. I’ll Take It.

                There’s been a lot of talk lately about “pay for performance,” especially when people like a certain presidential candidate mentions revising No Child Left Behind.

                As mentioned in “About” here on Current Education Issues, I have a business background.  So you can understand why I welcome it…under certain conditions.

                The reason I throw in this disclaimer is that the current idea of “pay for performance” is invalid.  Proponents of pay-for-performance want to rate me on how my class performs on the standardized test that I give them every year.  Consider the following real scenario:  Last year I taught the “gifted class” with little or no behavior problems, family issues, or special education designations.  This year I taught the “sweat-hogs,” who were full of behavior problems, family issues, and special education designations.

                How do you think my scores look this year compared to last year?  They suck.

               

Now, imagine I am the reincarnation of Horace Mann, and have won North American teacher of the year ten years running.  I am a virtual New England Patriots of teaching.  I am a dynasty.  How do my scores look now?

 

 

 





 

 

 

 





 

 

 

 

 





 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

  • Archives: