Give Me a Fair Pay-For-Performance Plan. I’ll Take It.
There’s been a lot of talk lately about “pay for performance,” especially when people like a certain presidential candidate mentions revising No Child Left Behind.
As mentioned in “About” here on Current Education Issues, I have a business background. So you can understand why I welcome it…under certain conditions.
The reason I throw in this disclaimer is that the current idea of “pay for performance” is invalid. Proponents of pay-for-performance want to rate me on how my class performs on the standardized test that I give them every year. Consider the following real scenario: Last year I taught the “gifted class” with little or no behavior problems, family issues, or special education designations. This year I taught the “sweat-hogs,” who were full of behavior problems, family issues, and special education designations.
How do you think my scores look this year compared to last year? They suck.
Leave a Reply